Two other appointments were confirmed by the U.S. Senate for the Territorial Supreme Court, but rejected their appointments: John Noble Goodwin in 1863 and Marshall H. Williams in 1894. [46] The Arizona Supreme Court consists of seven judges, including a Chief Justice, a Vice Chief Justice and five Associate Justices. The Governor of Arizona appoints each new judge with the support of a nominating committee. To be eligible, an applicant must be under the age of 70, have resided in Arizona for at least 10 years, and be licensed to practice in Arizona for at least 10 years. Once a new judge has been appointed, he or she will be in office for at least two years before going through a binding election. Thereafter, they will serve renewable terms for six years. The Chief Justice and the Vice-Chief Justice shall hold these offices for a renewable term of five years.

A judge may not hold any other public office and may not participate in campaigns other than his own. The primary functions of the Supreme Court under Article VI, § 5 of the Arizona Constitution are to review appeals and establish rules of procedure for all Arizona courts. It is the highest court in the state of Arizona and is often referred to as the court of last resort. The Supreme Court has discretionary jurisdiction, which means it can refuse to consider the lower court`s findings. However, cases where a trial judge has sentenced an accused to death are automatically referred to the Supreme Court for review. Judges of the Supreme Court Seven judges sit on the Supreme Court for a regular term of six years. A judge is chosen by other judges to serve as Chief Justice for a five-year term. In addition to handling cases like other judges, the Chief Justice oversees the administrative operations of all Arizona courts. Section 6 of the Arizona Constitution governs the Arizona Supreme Court, established in 1912. Section 5 of Article 6 gives the court the discretion to review the decisions of the subordinate courts of the State, including the decisions of the Court of Appeal and certain decisions of the Supreme Court. The Arizona Supreme Court must consider an appeal in a case where an accused has received the death penalty, but it may refuse to reconsider an appeal in another case.

Parties seeking reconsideration by the Supreme Court must file an application for review with the court. Each January, judges select a Chief Justice and an Associate Chief Justice. [45] Court Staff The Arizona Constitution authorizes the Supreme Court to appoint a clerk and an assistant. According to a.R.S. § 12-202, the clerk shall attend court sessions, issue legal documents, register all court orders, judgments and decrees, keep other books and perform other duties required by law or court. The Clerk`s Office maintains official court records and helps plan decisions and hearings. The Clerk`s Office is also responsible for the publication and dissemination of the court`s written opinions. All state Supreme Court judges, appeals court judges, and Pima County Supreme Court judges received unanimous support from the commission. The state`s Supreme Court removed the voting measure two years ago, but saved it from the same fate this year after Maricopa County Superior Court Justice Christopher Coury kicked it in court over the wording of his motion.

In Arizona, the governor appoints the judges, but the voters decide if they want to keep them. The unique role of judges as arbiters for democracy can make it particularly difficult for voters to consider whether they should keep a judge. Some voters may want to see judges rule on issues that are important to them, but there is no single tracking system for that. The conservative Center for Arizona Policy has a voter guide that shows how judges have ruled in the past, but it doesn`t follow the decisions of Supreme Court justices. In addition to hearing appeals, the Arizona Supreme Court oversees the actions of the Arizona Bar Association and the Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct. The Chief Justice of the Court also presides over the Senate impeachment proceedings against officials accused of crimes. The Arizona Commission on Judicial Performance Review evaluates judges based on characteristics such as legal capacity, integrity, and temperament. Since 1992, the Commission has been examining judicial candidates for approval by the Governor.

The Court`s role in impeachment is a political process designed to deal with officials accused of committing serious crimes, misdemeanours or misconduct in the performance of their duties. The person is charged, tried and, if convicted, removed from office. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court presides over impeachment proceedings in the Senate, but does not make a decision on the guilt or innocence of the official in court. Formal indictments for an impeachment offense are introduced by a majority vote in the Arizona House of Representatives. Conviction for the impeachment offense requires a two-thirds majority in the Senate. After a conviction, a civil servant is dismissed from office. The role of the Supreme Court in impeachment proceedings is set out in Article VIII, Part 2, § 1 of the Arizona Constitution. Justia`s Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court ruled that public order prohibits an agreement between a builder-seller and a home buyer to ensure the treatment and habitability contained in any contract between . Justia`s Summary of Opinion: The Supreme Court ruled that if a debtor defaults on a debt secured by a trust deed and the trustee decides to sell the property, the trustee`s act to register and deliver a trustee`s notice of sale does not. In Pima County, there are 25 judges on the ballot, and it is up to voters to decide if they want to keep their jobs.

But many voters don`t know how to judge a judge. Justia`s Summary of Opinion: In this case of dissolution of marriage, the Supreme Court has ruled that the appropriate method for determining the interest of the conjugal community in separate property should begin with the litigants who will present the “Drahos/Barnett.. Impeachment of a judge may involve impeachment by the Arizona House of Representatives in a majority vote, and then conviction by the Arizona Senate by a two-thirds majority. In addition, the Arizona Supreme Court may remove a judge if the Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct recommends this measure. Judges are not politicians. They don`t create politics or spend taxpayers` money, but their decisions have a huge impact on life in Arizona. Just this year, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled that Gov. Doug Ducey`s order to postpone evictions could remain in place after being challenged by homeowner groups, but Ducey was forced to reopen the gyms following a decision by Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Timothy Thomason. Summary of Justia`s statement: The Supreme Court ruled that exempting the referendum power for the law “to support and maintain departments of state government and state institutions,” see Ariz. Const.

4, point 1, 1, paragraph 3, ,..