Have you ever had to convince an SME that it cannot have answers that are “h” in one question and “c” in the next? It`s a bit of a UI issue. When the number of options is constant from one question to the next, learners can know what to expect. Research doesn`t seem to agree on whether 3, 4 or 5 options are best. Personally, I like to use 4 options. That`s right. For international and foreign applications, such foreign applications must normally be filed within one year from the priority date of the United States of America, unless a PCT application is filed in time to extend the time limit for filing domestic applications in each foreign country. Reliability and validity will be questioned if you don`t have the same number of options/distractions for each. More distractions make things harder, fewer distractions make them easier. There can be no dispute about this – there must be consistency, otherwise what is the point of testing? Priority date refers to the earliest filing date in a family of patent applications.

If there is only one patent application, the priority date will of course be the filing date of the single application. If an applicant has filed a number of related patent applications, the priority date would be the filing date of the first patent application that first disclosed the invention. The oldest patent application, called a priority application, may include a provisional patent application, a non-provisional patent application, or a foreign application. In the hypothetical situation above, the following priority dates would result for each characteristic: Depending on your particular situation, your priority date is as follows: Over the past few years, there has been a lot of discussion about what medical students should learn and how they should be evaluated. In addition, high-profile cases of physician poor performance have fueled efforts to find a way to ensure that qualified physicians acquire and maintain appropriate knowledge, skills, and attitudes throughout their professional lives.1 Which of the following is a top priority in caring for this patient? (e.g. in the emergency room). With the priority date, we determine whether another patent application or publicly available document can be considered prior art against your patent application. In general, patent applications filed before your priority date and publicly available documents published before your priority date are considered prior art. One of the most common ways to lose the benefit of an earlier filing date is that a provisional application is not converted to a non-provisional application within one year from the provisional filing date. Refile preliminary results at a later priority date, which could open up more prior art that can be used against you. When designing the assessment of medical competence, a number of issues must be taken into account.

Reliability, which refers to the reproducibility or consistency of a test result, validity, which refers to the extent to which a test measures what it claims to measure,11,12 and standard-setting, which defines the endpoint of the assessment.1 Sources of validity evidence refer to content, the response process, internal structure, relationship to other variables, and consequences of evaluation results.13 Hi Santosh, I understand what you`re looking for, but I don`t know of any such product. There could be one or something like a survey tool. I wonder if Survey Monkey has that capability. You may be able to accomplish this with lightweight programming in one of Google`s free tools. Try asking one of the eLearning development groups on LinkedIn. Tell us what you find! Connie Basically, every feature has a priority date when it was first submitted. Since new functionalities are prioritized later, depending on when they were first introduced in a patent application, it is preferable to file the corresponding applications as soon as possible. You want your new features or changes to have the earliest possible priority date to reduce the number of prior art references that can be invoked against claims listing these new features. Assessment can act as a trigger and inform candidates about what is really important to teachers3 and the value they attach to different forms of knowledge and ways of thinking. In fact, it has been found that assessment is perhaps the biggest impact on student learning.

Students` focus on testing topics (i.e., 4 It has been found that students differ in the quality of their learning when asked to focus either on factual details or on assessing the evidence.5 In addition, research has shown that changes in assessment methods cause medical students to modify their study activities.4 Since assessment methods prevent learning in medicine and other disciplines, 1 It is important that assessment tools test the characteristics required of students or professionals undergoing revalidation. Staff then redesign their assessment methods to ensure that the forms of assessment are consistent with their educational objectives.6 The introductory question should provide clear instructions on what the candidate must do to answer the question. Ambiguity and the use of imprecise terms should be avoided.16,18 There is no room for tricky questions in MCQ exams. Negative strains should be avoided, as well as double-negative strains. Always, never and only are demonstrably controversial in an inexact science like medicine and should not be used.16,18 Multiple-choice questions were introduced into medical examinations in the 1950s and have proven to be more reliable for testing knowledge than traditional essay questions. It is one of the most important established examination tools widely used in the evaluation of undergraduate and postgraduate medical examinations. The MCQ is an objective question where you agree beforehand on the correct answer. This widespread use may have led examiners to use the term MCQ as a synonym for an objective question.15 Since their introduction, many changes have been made to MCQs that have resulted in formats.16 Like other assessment methods, they have their strengths and weaknesses. The evaluation of questions is simple and reliable, and their use allows for a wide selection of students` knowledge in an exam of reasonable duration.15–19 MCQ-based exams are also reliable because they are quick and a short exam always allows for a large sample on each topic.19 Well-designed MCQs can also taxonomically increase cognitive processing such as interpretation. Knowledge synthesis and application instead of testing the retrieval of isolated facts.20 They could test a range of skills in addition to factual retrieval and are reliable, discriminatory, repeatable and cost-effective.