They are both suitable, but the difference between them is that the following (sometimes written in two words, below) usually refers only to writing in a document, whereas from now on it is more general and now only means. For what it`s worth, I`ve only seen in the legal documents below (most recently my lease). In the context of a document, both can be used, but are explicitly limited to the document or corpus in which they appear. Therefore, it is often the preferred choice for inventing a substitute term or phrase: n. reference in a written contract to identify one of the persons entering into the contract. The agreement would read as follows: `Mary McConnell (hereinafter referred to as part of Part One)`. It is preferable to identify the parties by an abbreviated form of their name (“McConnell”) or as buyers, sellers, owners, trustees or other useful identifications. The use of the name helps to follow and understand the contract and avoids confusion with “the part of the second party” that identifies another party to the agreement. The afterlife (“In time to come” and “From now on”) works better, I think, than from now or later. For example: this does not mean that you can no longer write in a document. For example, you could write: To answer your question, “below” (or “below”) is probably what you would use for your purposes. Both are only used in legal documents that are otherwise considered archaic.

In the following[? In the following, hot dogs are referred to as Exhibit B. Both words sound too “legal.” If you just want to replace one word with another, you can simply add it in parentheses after the first use, as you would with an abbreviation. It is `ACME Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the supplier` but `hereinafter referred to as Ms Miller`. When you (hereinafter the buyer) purchase this product,. * Below we won`t go to 7-11 for hot dogs. In this work, I will support the idea that from now on, all hot dogs should be called hot pigs. After that, you can refer to the United States and my book, and the reader will know what you mean. The following would not be appropriate, as it overly limits the scope of the author`s complaint.